We value thoughtful and informed discussion about science, tech, politics, legislation, history, and more importantly, family, food, and funny memes!
Sit back, enjoy scintillating conversation, a few laughs, and relish this life of ours.
Montana Legislature
67th Regular Session
Bill Type - Number: SB 370
Bill Actions - Current Bill Progress: Became Law
Short Title: Protecting constitutional rights during an emergency
"Section 1. Section 10-3-101, MCA, is amended to read:
"10-3-101. Declaration of policy. Because of the existing and increasing possibility of the occurrence of disasters or emergencies of unprecedented size and destructiveness resulting from enemy attack, sabotage, or other hostile action and natural disasters and in order to provide for prompt and timely reaction to an emergency or disaster, to ensure that preparation of this state will be adequate to deal with disasters or emergencies, and generally to provide for the common defense and to protect the public peace, health, and safety and to preserve the lives and property of the people of this state to the fullest extent practicable, it is declared to be necessary to:
...
(11) ensure the protections under the first amendment of the United States constitution and under Article II, sections 6 and 7, of the Montana constitution of the rights of free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances; and
(12) ensure the protection of the rights under the second amendment of the United States constitution and under Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution."
...
Section 4. Codification instruction. [Section 3] is intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 10, chapter 3, and the provisions of Title 10, chapter 3, apply to [section 3].
Section 5. Effective date. [This act] is effective on passage and approval." ~ leg.mt.gov/bills/2021/billpdf/SB0370.pdf
laws.leg.mt.gov/legprd/LAW0210W$BSIV.ActionQuery?P_BILL_NO1=370&P_BLTP_BILL_TYP_CD=SB&Z_ACTION=Find&P_SESS=20211
Images
(1) Statue of Liberty Image by Santiago Masquelet.
Uploaded to freeimages.com/photo/statue-of-liberty-1639020.
(2) Two U.S. Flags (representing U.S. Federal Bill of Rights, 2nd Amendment) with "The Bond Arms Patriot, in .45 Colt & .410, Honors of Military Veterans. Capable of firing both .45 Colt and .410 shotshells, the Bond Arms Patriot, featuring laser-carved rosewood grips, provides a unique defense gun." ~ personaldefenseworld.com/2019/11/bond-arms-patriot
bondarms.com/bond-arms-handguns/patriot
bondarms.com/gun-safety-education
(3) Breaking chains. ID 95740447 © Higyou | Dreamstime.com
Uploaded to dreamstime.com/stock-illustration-shackles-locked-break-breaking-chain-locks-dark-metal-d-illustration-isolated-horizontal-over-white-image95740447
Grand Jury, Day 2: Historical Background
Alex Thomson, former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency to NSA has just completed his statement.
Matthew Ehret, Senior Fellow of American University in Moscow, Editor-in-chief of Canadian Patriot dot org and BRI Expert of Tactical Talk dot net then makes his own short statement.
Pay attention to what Ehret says about traps patriots/freedom lovers may easily fall into, traps laid via propaganda.
No lockdowns.
Facemasks not required.
Vaccines not required.
2 metre space between people suggested.
Tragic deaths and patients ill with COVID-19 are in low numbers.
Here is the updated information from the Danish government:
https://www.sst.dk/en/English/Corona-eng
When did Denmark back down from draconian law enforcement?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/danish-govt-backs-down-on-forced-covid-vaccination-law-after-citizens-protest-with-pots-and-pans
Why exactly did the Danes reject the proposed law?
https://www.thelocal.dk/20201113/explained-what-is-denmarks-proposed-epidemic-law-and-why-is-it-being-criticised/
Ended a debate between Senators Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Hayne of South Carolina.
Daniel Webster won the day, but with hindsight, modern citizens may side with Hayne.
Hayne re-enforced the idea of a confederation while Webster defended the idea of a federation.
In a confederacy the people may overcome tyrants quicker than in a federation, for in THAT condition, do the words of the Unites States constitution have TEETH. #AntiFederalistPaper9 http://resources.utulsa.edu/law/classes/rice/Constitutional/AntiFederalist/09.htm "We [the Aristocratic party of the United States,] do not much like that sturdy privilege of the people -- the right to demand the writ of habeas corpus. We have therefore reserved the power of refusing it in cases of rebellion, and you know we are the judges of what is rebellion...."
Images:
Robert Y. Hayne
Unknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Daniel Webster
Unknown photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
/winter-solstice-896318944-5c48dbbf46e0fb000130e402.jpg)
