Let's begin by reading ABOUT the Federalist and the opposing Anti-Federalist Papers!
"The Federalist Papers were a series of eighty-five essays urging the citizens of New York to ratify the new United States Constitution. Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, the essays originally appeared anonymously in New York newspapers in 1787 and 1788 under the pen name "Publius." The Federalist Papers are considered one of the most important sources for interpreting and understanding the original intent of the Constitution." ~ https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers
There are a total of 85 papers, published as newspaper articles. These were published over the course of 2 years. The purpose? To allow the American public to discuss and DECIDE on the various aspects of the United States Constitution.
In addition to the Federalist Papers, there were also the equally important 85 Anti-Federalist papers. All of these papers, or newspaper articles, were published over the course of the same 2 years.
"The arguments against ratification appeared in various forms, by various authors, most of whom used a pseudonym. Collectively, these writings have become known as the Anti-Federalist Papers. We here present some of the best and most widely read of these. They contain warnings of dangers from tyranny that weaknesses in the proposed Constitution did not adequately provide against, and while some of those weaknesses were corrected by adoption of the Bill of Rights, others remained, and some of these dangers are now coming to pass." ~ https://thefederalistpapers.org/anti-federalist-papers
Adult and hopefully responsible members of a constitutional republic, United States' citizens have a say in governmental processes... so how best to choose? First, one must learn what this government is all about.
Let's start this process as an ordinary citizen of New York in 1788 would have! To get into the spirit, I've uploaded an oil-on-canvas 1855 painting by American painter Tompkins Harrison Matteson (1813–1884) entitled "The Making of Ammunition." Apropos, is it not?
(Oil on canvass. 36 in. x 48.5 in. Courtesy of the Chrysler Museum of Art. Image courtesy of The Athenaeum.)
Next Thursday, we shall begin with the readings. Meanwhile, comments? Thoughts? Ideas? Let's read your own unique perspective!
Grand Jury, Day 2: Historical Background
Alex Thomson, former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency to NSA has just completed his statement.
Matthew Ehret, Senior Fellow of American University in Moscow, Editor-in-chief of Canadian Patriot dot org and BRI Expert of Tactical Talk dot net then makes his own short statement.
Pay attention to what Ehret says about traps patriots/freedom lovers may easily fall into, traps laid via propaganda.
No lockdowns.
Facemasks not required.
Vaccines not required.
2 metre space between people suggested.
Tragic deaths and patients ill with COVID-19 are in low numbers.
Here is the updated information from the Danish government:
https://www.sst.dk/en/English/Corona-eng
When did Denmark back down from draconian law enforcement?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/danish-govt-backs-down-on-forced-covid-vaccination-law-after-citizens-protest-with-pots-and-pans
Why exactly did the Danes reject the proposed law?
https://www.thelocal.dk/20201113/explained-what-is-denmarks-proposed-epidemic-law-and-why-is-it-being-criticised/
Ended a debate between Senators Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Hayne of South Carolina.
Daniel Webster won the day, but with hindsight, modern citizens may side with Hayne.
Hayne re-enforced the idea of a confederation while Webster defended the idea of a federation.
In a confederacy the people may overcome tyrants quicker than in a federation, for in THAT condition, do the words of the Unites States constitution have TEETH. #AntiFederalistPaper9 http://resources.utulsa.edu/law/classes/rice/Constitutional/AntiFederalist/09.htm "We [the Aristocratic party of the United States,] do not much like that sturdy privilege of the people -- the right to demand the writ of habeas corpus. We have therefore reserved the power of refusing it in cases of rebellion, and you know we are the judges of what is rebellion...."
Images:
Robert Y. Hayne
Unknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Daniel Webster
Unknown photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons