Regarding modern Chinese embassies, I've heard of two things: Confucius schools of thought and the CCP. This has confused me because Confucianism, to my understanding, seems in direct conflict with totalitarianism.
Yesterday I learned about Shang Jun Shu, aka Shang Martingale (390 BCE - 338 BCE). This merciless statesman served under Duke Xiao of Qin during the Warring States Period (475 BC - 221 BC). https://www.sutori.com/en/story/post-classical-china--hbr9zvoE1tdrMd1N6GrXrBQo
Apparently, his text "The Book of Lord Shang" https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/... is foundational material for the modern day CCP.
He called for weak people. https://ctext.org/shang-jun-shu/w...
"A weak people means a strong state and a strong state means a weak people. Therefore, a country, which has the right way, is concerned with weakening the people."
An apparent reason the CCP and its acolytes are against anyone who values liberty.
The CCP's foundational documents are not like the Magna Carta (which eventually leads to the concept of inalienable rights).
Quite the opposite. Members and followers of the CCP, it seems, believe in the value of "Weakening the People."
WOW
Credits:
Thanks to @Mr3rights from https://gettr.com/post/pm63o05f65 for discussing the foundation the CCP's ideology.
Images:
Public Domain - https://www.sutori.com/en/story/post-classical-china--hbr9zvoE1tdrMd1N6GrXrBQo
https://ctext.org/shang-jun-shu/weakening-the-people
https://www.fakedisk.com/en/article/2021122004.html
Public Domain - https://art-mohamad.blogspot.com/2017/11/shang-yang-individu-disebalik.html
Grand Jury, Day 2: Historical Background
Alex Thomson, former officer of Britain’s Signal Intelligence Agency, GCHQ, the partner agency to NSA has just completed his statement.
Matthew Ehret, Senior Fellow of American University in Moscow, Editor-in-chief of Canadian Patriot dot org and BRI Expert of Tactical Talk dot net then makes his own short statement.
Pay attention to what Ehret says about traps patriots/freedom lovers may easily fall into, traps laid via propaganda.
No lockdowns.
Facemasks not required.
Vaccines not required.
2 metre space between people suggested.
Tragic deaths and patients ill with COVID-19 are in low numbers.
Here is the updated information from the Danish government:
https://www.sst.dk/en/English/Corona-eng
When did Denmark back down from draconian law enforcement?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/danish-govt-backs-down-on-forced-covid-vaccination-law-after-citizens-protest-with-pots-and-pans
Why exactly did the Danes reject the proposed law?
https://www.thelocal.dk/20201113/explained-what-is-denmarks-proposed-epidemic-law-and-why-is-it-being-criticised/
Ended a debate between Senators Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Hayne of South Carolina.
Daniel Webster won the day, but with hindsight, modern citizens may side with Hayne.
Hayne re-enforced the idea of a confederation while Webster defended the idea of a federation.
In a confederacy the people may overcome tyrants quicker than in a federation, for in THAT condition, do the words of the Unites States constitution have TEETH. #AntiFederalistPaper9 http://resources.utulsa.edu/law/classes/rice/Constitutional/AntiFederalist/09.htm "We [the Aristocratic party of the United States,] do not much like that sturdy privilege of the people -- the right to demand the writ of habeas corpus. We have therefore reserved the power of refusing it in cases of rebellion, and you know we are the judges of what is rebellion...."
Images:
Robert Y. Hayne
Unknown author, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Daniel Webster
Unknown photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons